Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

Nursing Resources at LLCC

Use this guide to learn about, find and access a variety of resources available to Nursing students at LLCC. Information about the Nursing Skills Lab (NSL) & NSL Resources PLUS LLCC Library Books & Databases and Research Instructions.Connect to Live Chat

CONTRAST - EBP GUIDELINES vs EBP RESEARCH

Types of EBP Nursing Research

  • Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) is NOT a good search term
    using these words in the search box is not an effective strategy for finding EBP articles
  • INSTEAD --  LOOK FOR:
    • Academic/Scholarly Journal     (Icons/limiters)
    • Peer-Reviewed      (check-box/limiters)
  • EXAMINE ARTICLE FOR:
    • abstract
    • intro / literature review / background
    • methods
    • results
    • conclusion/discussion
  • Evidence-based practice articles do the following:
    • provide the details of one or more scholarly, peer-reviewed, research articles
    • connect the results of the research to nursing practice
    • in the conclusions/discussion

Use the links below to resources for determining the difference between Qualitative Research (open-ended inquiry focusing on description) and Quantitative Research (controlled studies that focus on objective numeric measures)

Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis are techniques for combining the results of many studies on a single topic in order to expand the scale and application of results beyond a single study. Systematic Reviews combine the results of several studies and they sometimes use the statistical method of Meta-Analysis to accomplish this. You can have a systematic review that uses methods other than statistical meta-analysis to analyze the results but any study that uses Meta-Analysis is a systematic review. 

The key point is that these research studies/articles present the results of several studies analyzed together. 

Use the links below to compare and contrast. 

PICOT

PICOT Defined (from: Riva JJ, Malik KM, Burnie SJ, Endicott AR, Busse JW. What is your research question? An introduction to the PICOT format for clinicians. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2012 Sep;56(3):167-71. PMID: 22997465; PMCID: PMC3430448. )

The PICOT format is a helpful approach for summarizing research questions that explore the effect of therapy:

  • (P) – Population refers to the sample of subjects you wish to recruit for your study. There may be a fine balance between defining a sample that is most likely to respond to your intervention (e.g. no co-morbidity) and one that can be generalized to patients that are likely to be seen in actual practice.

  • (I) – Intervention refers to the treatment that will be provided to subjects enrolled in your study.

  • (C) – Comparison identifies what you plan on using as a reference group to compare with your treatment intervention. Many study designs refer to this as the control group. If an existing treatment is considered the ‘gold standard’, then this should be the comparison group.

  • (O) – Outcome represents what result you plan on measuring to examine the effectiveness of your intervention. Familiar and validated outcome measurement tools relevant to common chiropractic patient populations may include the Neck Disability Index or Roland-Morris Questionnaire. There are, typically, a multitude of outcome tools available for different clinical populations, each having strengths and weaknesses.

  • (T) – Time describes the duration for your data collection.